By Hon. Ikechi Anya
Politics, at its noblest, is the marketplace of ideas—robust, sometimes uncomfortable, but ultimately guided by reason, character, and service. What we have witnessed in recent days from our beloved billionaire clansman, Chief Dr. Ogba Onuoha Boudex, regrettably represents a stark case of political emotional manipulation. Political theorists describe this pattern as political gaslighting or emotional populism: the use of platitudes, fake empathy, praise-singing, and performative affection to bypass democratic debate and short-circuit critical thinking.
The optics were unsettling. A man of means, pedigree, and age suddenly experimenting with crude flattery and hollow theatrics resembles, quite sadly, an adult insisting on being fed with a bottle. It neither inspires confidence nor signals readiness for serious leadership. Rather than articulate a coherent vision for Abia North, the public was served a spectacle of attention-seeking and gaslighting—an approach that grossly underestimates the intelligence and political maturity of Abia people.
This descent is particularly jarring given Chief Boudex’s prior proximity to power. His time as a caretaker local government chairman remains a subject of public discussion, with persistent allegations—fair or otherwise—of intemperate conduct, profanity, and bullying of local staff. In leadership, perception matters. Authority without restraint erodes trust. Temperament is not a private flaw; it is a public qualification.
As the political season returns, familiar habits have resurfaced. Every Dick and Harry has turned up for duty, and the usual tethering to “big men” for strategic positioning has begun anew. In this environment, Chief Boudex appears to have lined up his tactics and delivered a poorly conceived political salvo. It was neither refreshing nor courageous. It read as the posture of an unpaid mercenary on a bitter errand—ready to profit from any seedy electoral arrangement or systemic party patronage that may present itself.
These tactics are outdated. They belong to a bygone era when noise substituted for substance and theatrics silenced debate. In an ongoing democracy, emotional populism cannot shun democratic discourse. Crocodile tears do not rewrite political reality. In Abia North, such theatrics move no one. The zone stands on solid ground—well represented, confident, and acutely aware of the stakes ahead, especially with the credible possibility of a Senate Presidency being zoned to the Southeast. This is not a season for reckless experimentation.
Chief Boudex has hinted at an interest in vying to “retire” the amiable and indefatigable Senator Orji Uzor Kalu. Frankly, the Orji Uzor Kalu Campaign Organization would welcome such an opportunity. Not out of arrogance, but out of confidence in record, reach, and reality. A direct contest would expose, in the most democratic manner possible, the vast difference between noise and substance, between ambition and capacity. It would likely result in an electoral outcome so decisive that it would permanently discourage the recycling of emotional populism as a serious political strategy in Abia North.
Public perception already paints a troubling contrast: a contender often seen as inaccessible to constituents and louder in advertising philanthropy on social media than in legislative advocacy, versus a senator whose experience, visibility, and national relevance are evident. Publicity is not performance. Noise is not representation.
When compared to Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, the difference in experience stands miles apart—so evident that even the blind can see it. Kalu’s record as a former governor, his legislative maturity, his national networks, and his strategic relevance at the federal level place him far above any current contestant in Abia North. Representation at this level is not about clout-seeking; it is about leverage, continuity, and results.
By contrast, Chief Boudex increasingly fits the profile of an adventurous quadrennial politician—erratic in thought, clumsy in honesty, and driven more by ego than service. Power, in this frame, is not a tool for public good but an accessory for class admission and self-validation. Abia people have seen this script before, and they are no longer entertained by it.
Thankfully, Abia electorates are sophisticated and discerning. They know who fits where—who belongs at the local, state, or national level—and they vote accordingly. They are not swayed by fake love, empty praise, or manufactured outrage. Democracy thrives on debate, not gaslighting; on substance, not sentimentality.
The task before us is clear: to keep the tempo and momentum going until the job is done at the federal level. Abia North must not gamble with its future. Experience matters. Capacity matters. National relevance matters. Senator Orji Uzor Kalu embodies these qualities. Until the mandate is fully fulfilled, Abia North must remain focused, united, and unseduced by the politics of emotional manipulation.