Connect with us

NEWS

Court Bars Turaki-Led NWC From PDP National Secretariat

Published

on

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court Abuja, has restrained the Kabiru Turaki-led National Working Committee (NWC) from gaining access into the national secretariat of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja.

Justice Abdulmalik made the order while delivering judgment in a suit instituted by a group of the party loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike.

Justice Abdulmalik also ordered security agencies, including the Nigerian Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS), among others, to give adequate protection to the PDP led by Abdulrahman Mohammed while accessing the secretariat.

The judge held that the purported national convention held by the Turaki-led group on November 15 and 16, 2025, in Ibadan and the election of the party’s officials, against the valid court orders, was a nullity.

She said the convention violated Section 287(3) of the Nigerian Constitution (as amended), as well as the PDP’s constitution.

The judge described the expulsion of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, and his allies from the party during the 2025 convention as an affront to the order of the court.

“I considered the expulsion of the members of the plaintiffs as not only an affront to the subsisting judgment, but also a direct assault on a democratic and principled society,” the judge said.

She said such action had no place where the rule of law is in practice.

According to the judge, all proceedings, resolutions, and decisions taken at the said convention, including the suspension of members of the first plaintiff, were unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void, and of no effect.

The camp of the FCT minister, led by its acting National Chairman, Mohammed Abdulrahman, had filed the suit.

In the suit, the PDP, Abdulrahman, and the National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, had prayed the court to stop the police and DSS from allowing Turaki-led leadership (listed as fifth to 25th defendants) access to the party’s national secretariat at Wadara Plaza in Abuja.

They also sought an order of injunction, restraining INEC from accepting any other office address or any other address from the Turaki-led leadership as the PDP’s office address other than as already contained in the commission’s records.

They further sought an order of injunction, restraining the Turaki leadership from parading themselves as representatives of the PDP in any capacity whatsoever, among other reliefs.

Justice Abdulmalik had earlier granted an ex parte motion brought by the plaintiffs directing parties not to take any action pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Following the order, the Turaki-led faction challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal.

They also filed an application for the court to stay proceedings in the suit pending the decision of the appeal court.

The Turaki group, through their lawyer, equally filed a motion on notice asking Justice Abdulmalik to recuse (withdraw) herself from the case.

They argued that there existed a reasonable and well-founded apprehension of the likelihood of bias against them in the manner the suit had been handled by the judge.

Delivering the judgment, Justice Abdulmalik held that, in line with the Constitution and other enabling statutes, including earlier judgments, it would not shy away from its duty to do what is just in the circumstances.

The judge said that the main determinant of the case is Section 287(3) of the Constitution, which provides that the decisions of the Federal High Court and other courts established by the Constitution shall be enforced by all authorities and persons across the federation.

She observed that “in spite of the judgments which have not been set aside, the fifth to 25th defendants went ahead and organised the convention.”

Justice Abdulmalik added that those same judgments had also been affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

She further cited that a party’s constitution is meant to be followed by its members; hence, the issues raised in the originating summons by the plaintiffs were meritorious.

She, therefore, granted the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought.

“The defendants are bound to comply with and give full effect to the subsisting judgments of the Federal High Court earlier referred to.

“The first to fourth defendants are not entitled to recognise or give effect, in any manner whatsoever, to the purported national convention held on 15 and 16 November 2025 by the fifth to 25th defendants and their associates.

“The purported convention, including the election of officers and suspension of members, is unconstitutional, null and void, ” she ruled.

Justice Abdulmalik said the plaintiffs (Wike’s group) were entitled to remain in office and continue to use the party’s national secretariat and properties.

‘No Shred Of Evidence’

On the application filed for the judge to recuse herself from the case, she held that the Turaki-led faction failed to substantiate the argument with evidence that the court was biased.

She also held that allegations of bias must be proven with credible evidence, not mere suspicion.

The judge observed that claims of a “likelihood of bias” are “a state of mind, incapable of precise definition,” and must be supported by “cogent and credible evidence.”

The judge said she found “no shred of evidence” to justify the allegation and stressed that the mere grant of an ex parte order did not amount to bias.

On the request to transfer the case back to the chief judge (CJ) for reassignment, she held that the power to assign cases lies with the CJ and that it was “not the place of counsel to determine which judge will hear and determine their case.”

Justice Abdulmalik further stated that any dissatisfaction with her decisions was a matter for appeal, not recusal, and consequently refused the application for lack of merit.

On the motion challenging the competence of the suit, the judge also declined to strike out the case.

She further rejected the arguments that the court lacked jurisdiction and that the plaintiffs had no locus standi.

The defendants had argued that the dispute was purely an internal party affair, an abuse of court process, and that the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to institute the suit.

In her decision, the judge held that “jurisdiction is the lifewire and pillar upon which any matter can be determined” and must be assessed based on the originating processes.

She found that the claims involved the interpretation and enforcement of constitutional and statutory provisions, as well as compliance with earlier court judgments.

She, therefore, agreed with the plaintiffs that the suit was within the court’s jurisdiction.

The judge, who held that the objections raised by the defendants lacked merit, dismissed the application in its entirety.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NEWS

Governors, LG Chairmen Should Be Held Accountable for Kidnappings – Daniel Bwala

Published

on

By

The Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala, has said that state governors and local government chairmen, rather than the Federal Government, should be held responsible for kidnappings occurring in their domains.

Bwala made the assertion on Wednesday during his appearance on The Morayo Afolabi-Brown Show, where he was grilled on the Federal Government’s response to the ongoing abduction of schoolchildren and teachers in Oyo State and the broader insecurity challenges across the country.

“Every kidnapping and abduction that takes place in any state of Nigeria, hold that governor responsible. All the kidnappings have taken place in local government,” he said.

The presidential aide pointed to the federal Save the School Initiative, under which funds were provided to states for perimeter fencing, early warning systems, and other security measures in schools. He challenged citizens to demand accountability from their governors on the utilisation of the money.

“There was this thing called the Save the School Initiative, in which monies were given to states to create perimeter fencing, early warning signs and all of those checks in schools. Ask your governor where that money went to,” Bwala said.

He further alleged that many local governments are not receiving funds directly allocated to them. Citing Oyo State as an example, he noted: “In three local governments in Oyo, I said this local government has 600 million coming here every month, and that’s how it is across Nigeria.”

Bwala argued that if such funds were released directly to local government chairmen, they could be deployed for maternal healthcare, basic education, local security through vigilantes, and welfare for the elderly.

The presidential spokesman criticised what he described as a passive culture among Nigerians, urging citizens to take greater responsibility for demanding accountability at the grassroots level.

“It’s only in Nigeria that citizens wait for manna to come from heaven. In all other countries of the world, citizens take their destinies in their hands,” he said.

Bwala explained that the current constitutional framework limits the President’s direct control over state governors. “The unfortunate part of the democracy we are practising today is that it does not place the President as a head boy or prefect of the governors,” he noted.

He contrasted this with former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s approach, saying President Tinubu, as a democrat, would not resort to extra-constitutional measures and could only urge governors to act responsibly.

Bwala called on Nigerians to organise town hall meetings at the local government level and engage the media to demand transparency on funds that are not being remitted to local authorities. He emphasised that sustained public pressure would be more effective than isolated complaints.

Responding to questions about the Oyo schoolchildren and teachers who have spent over 50 days in captivity, Bwala said the Federal Government’s primary concern remains their safe and unharmed release.

“The number one responsibility of government in a hostage-taking situation is to rescue them and rescue them alive. If you use force carelessly, you may end up jeopardising the lives of the people that are kidnapped,” he explained.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Tragedy in Kogi as Female teacher is beaten to death by the father of a student she disciplined

Published

on

By

Tragedy struck in Kogi State as a 22-year-old teacher at Brains Minds Nursery and Primary School, Ugbamaka-Igah, in Olamaboro Local Government Area, Maryam Usman, allegedly died after being assaulted by the father of one of her pupils over disciplinary action taken against the child.

The incident reportedly began on June 17, when the late teacher disciplined a pupil for misconduct in school.

During the process, the pupil allegedly fell and sustained an arm injury.

Following the incident, the pupil’s father, identified as Ishaq Abdullahi, allegedly stormed Maryam’s residence with two other individuals and assaulted her.

Sources said she was attacked again later the same day while on her way to the mosque.

According to the deceased’s brother, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Maryam was assaulted again on June 18 by additional individuals, leaving her severely injured and unconscious.

“She was taken to a clinic and later transferred to a hospital in Okpo, but her condition continued to deteriorate. Sadly, she died on June 25, 2026, at about 5:00 a.m.,” he said.

He called on the Nigeria Police Force and other relevant authorities to conduct a thorough investigation and ensure justice.

“We believe the repeated assaults contributed to her death and we want those responsible to be brought to justice,” he added.

A community elder, Drisu, disclosed that the deceased had family ties with the family of the disciplined pupil, noting that several meetings had been held between both families in an effort to resolve the matter.

He further revealed that, angered by Maryam’s death, members of her family allegedly invaded and vandalised the residence of the pupil’s father.

The Kogi State Police Command has confirmed the incident and said investigations were ongoing.

Responding to enquiries, the Police Public Relations Officer, ASP Saliu Oyiza Afusat, said preliminary investigations showed that on June 18, 2026, Abdullahi Ishaq, accompanied by two women, went to Brains Minds Nursery and Primary School in Ugbamaka and assaulted Maryam Usman for disciplining a pupil.

“The victim sustained serious injuries and was initially treated at a hospital in Ugbamaka before being referred to Iko-Ojo Hospital, Okpo, for further medical attention. She, however, passed away on June 25, 2026,” the police spokesperson said.

Afusat added that police operatives visited the scene and the deceased’s residence, where necessary documentation was carried out.

“Arrangements are ongoing to convey the corpse to the General Hospital, Ankpa, for medical examination and autopsy. The suspects fled before the arrival of the police, and efforts are ongoing to apprehend them. Upon their arrest, the case will be transferred to the State Criminal Investigation Department for a discreet and comprehensive investigation,” the statement added.

Continue Reading

NEWS

FUOYE Suspends Two Students Over Alleged Cyberbullying of Suspended SUG President

Published

on

By

The management of the Federal University Oye-Ekiti (FUOYE) has suspended two students with immediate effect over allegations of cyberbullying the institution’s suspended Students’ Union Government (SUG) President, James Iyanuoluwa Adio.

The suspension was announced in a statement published on the university’s official news portal on Friday and attributed to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Administration), Prof. Tajudeen Opoola, who is currently serving as the Acting Vice-Chancellor.

The affected students, Alao Iyanuoluwa Odunayo and Olawale Abiodun Samuel, were accused of conspiring to cyberbully Adio by allegedly posting details of his private affairs online after he failed to meet their financial demands.

According to the university management, the actions of the students amounted to misconduct capable of bringing the institution into disrepute.

The statement noted that investigations into the allegations were still ongoing but directed the students to proceed on suspension pending the outcome of the probe.

The management reiterated its commitment to maintaining discipline and safeguarding the institution’s reputation, stressing that it would not tolerate any behaviour capable of tarnishing the university’s image.

The development comes days after Adio himself was suspended by the university alongside the Deputy Director of Students’ Affairs over allegations of extortion.

Adio was accused of indirect involvement in the unlawful collection of ₦1,000 from newly admitted students for practical sessions, with authorities claiming that about ₦700,000 linked to the exercise was traced to his personal bank account.

Following his suspension, an explicit video allegedly involving the student leader surfaced online and circulated widely on social media, attracting reactions from members of the public and prompting the intervention of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS).

Continue Reading

Trending