Connect with us

NEWS

Anambra govt insists Peter Obi left debts, releases ‘evidence’

Published

on

Anambra State Government has accused former governor of the state, Peter Obi, of making false claims about the debt profile and financial records he left behind when he left office in 2014.

The state government, in a statement by the Commissioner for Information and Value Reformation, Law Mefor, on Wednesday, alleged that eight external loans contracted during Obi’s administration had an outstanding balance of N127.37 billion as of June 30, 2026, while also challenging his claim that he left over N2.13 billion in an ecological fund account.

The statement was issued in response to a recent post by Obi on what he described as “Phantom Debts and Ecological Loan Fallacy”, which the former governor appeared to have made in reaction to comments by the state Commissioner for Finance.

Mefor said the state government considered it necessary to respond because the issues involved public funds and debts that the present administration was still servicing.

He said records from the Debt Management Office (DMO) showed that eight external loans obtained during Obi’s tenure remained outstanding as of June 30, 2026.

The loans, according to the statement, were for the Malaria Control Booster Project, Third National Fadama Development Project, Health System Development Project II, Malaria Control Booster Project (Additional Financing), State Education Programme Investment Project, Community and Social Development Project, Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project, and Value Chain Development Project.

The government said the loans were originally valued at $123.77 million, while $92.35 million remained outstanding as of June 30, 2026, equivalent to N127.37 billion.

The statement said Obi’s administration had contracted the loans for projects covering malaria control, education, healthcare, community development, erosion control and agricultural value-chain development.

The state government said it was not opposed to borrowing where such funds were deployed to bankable projects and human capital development, adding that the current administration had continued to service the debts.

“We are not complaining. It is good for Anambra once we can show the impacts,” the statement quoted the government as saying.

The government also claimed that Obi spent about $4.05 billion during his eight years in office, which it said would amount to about N5.4 trillion when converted at the current official exchange rate.

It, however, acknowledged that governments could not be expected to complete all development projects within their tenure.

The government alleged that despite the expenditure, Obi left the state with challenges in areas including public water supply, education, healthcare, insecurity and infrastructure.

It claimed that 44 per cent of communities in the state, amounting to 78 out of 179 communities, did not have public primary schools, while only about 27 per cent of residents patronised public health institutions.

The state government also accused the former governor of leaving behind unpaid salary, pension and gratuity liabilities.

According to the statement, the current administration had cleared about N22 billion in inherited gratuity arrears owed to retired state and local government employees and teachers.

It, however, said some legacy liabilities dating back to previous administrations remained outstanding.

The government specifically mentioned salary arrears owed to workers of the defunct Water Corporation, saying the current administration had negotiated a settlement and paid the first two instalments of an agreed three-instalment arrangement.

It also alleged that 16 months of salary arrears owed to primary school teachers under the local government system had been verified and certified during Obi’s administration, but that only five months were eventually paid.

The state government said it had constituted a committee headed by the Head of Service to conduct a fresh verification of the outstanding liabilities.

The most contentious issue raised in the statement was Obi’s claim concerning an alleged N2.13 billion balance in a First Bank account at the UNIZIK branch in Awka.

The former governor had reportedly stated that he left more than N2.13 billion in the account when he left office on March 17, 2014, and challenged the state government to prove otherwise.

But Mefor said the government had obtained a certified statement of the account and discovered that it was an internally generated revenue (IGR) consolidated revenue account, rather than an ecological fund account.

He further claimed that the account records showed no inflow or balance corresponding to N2.13 billion from the time the account was opened in 2011 to date.

The commissioner therefore challenged Obi to explain where the money was kept, arguing that the account he cited did not support the claim.

The government also dismissed the N75 billion savings or investment reportedly attributed to the former administration as “phantom”, noting that the claim had been disputed by the previous administration.

Mefor said the state government was responding to the former governor in the interest of transparency and accountability, insisting that it remained focused on delivering development to the people of Anambra.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NEWS

NLC, TUC threaten nationwide action over unresolved demands

Published

on

By

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress have warned of possible nationwide industrial action following unsuccessful talks with the Federal Government over workers’ demands.

The unions said their next steps would depend on the outcome of another meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 27, adding that their affiliates and state councils had been directed to prepare for possible action if the government failed to make meaningful progress.

The meeting, held at the Federal Ministry of Labour in Abuja on Thursday, addressed demands for a reduction in petrol prices to 2024 levels, renegotiation of the national minimum wage, implementation of agreed tax relief measures and resolution of outstanding disputes involving health workers and other public servants.

In a joint statement signed by the NLC General Secretary, Benson Upah, and the TUC Secretary-General, Nuhu Toro, organised labour said the government delegation lacked the mandate required to negotiate substantively on the issues.

“No concrete commitments were secured, and the outstanding issues remain unresolved,” the unions said, expressing disappointment with the outcome of the meeting.

According to the statement, the Minister of Labour requested an adjournment until October 27 to allow the government to prepare adequately and ensure that relevant ministers and heads of departments and agencies attended the next session.

The unions said they remained open to dialogue but would not accept prolonged delays in addressing workers’ concerns.

“We will report back to our organs, and if no meaningful progress is made on Tuesday, the relevant organs of the NLC will decide the next line of action,” the statement added.

Labour also urged its affiliates, state councils and civil society allies to remain vigilant and begin preparations for possible nationwide action pending the outcome of the next meeting.

The unions, however, appealed to workers and members of the public to remain calm, expressing hope that the government would address their concerns at the rescheduled talks.

The dispute comes amid continuing concerns over rising living costs, fuel prices, workers’ purchasing power and the implementation of wage-related agreements following recent economic reforms.

Nigeria’s minimum wage was increased from ₦30,000 to ₦70,000 under the National Minimum Wage Act, 2024, following negotiations involving the Federal Government, organised labour and other stakeholders.

The unions’ renewed call for wage renegotiation reflects their demand for further discussions on pay and the economic pressures facing workers.

Organised labour is also seeking the implementation of agreed tax relief measures and the resolution of outstanding disputes involving the Joint Health Sector Unions and the Joint Public Service Negotiating Council.

The issues raised by the JPSNC include peculiar allowances, wage awards and hazard allowances, while the JOHESU dispute concerns outstanding terms of settlement affecting health-sector workers.

The NLC and TUC said they would attend the next meeting in the hope of securing progress, with any decision on industrial action to be taken by their respective organs if the talks fail to produce meaningful results.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Abia missed out on proposed states where Tinubu will visibly campaign

Published

on

By

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has released a proposed nationwide campaign rally schedule covering all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory ahead of the 2027 general elections, but Abia State is notably absent from the list of locations where President Bola Tinubu is expected to make personal appearances.

The campaign is billed to begin in Kaduna on October 24, 2026, and end with a grand rally in Lagos on January 9, 2027. While rallies are planned across the country’s six geopolitical zones, the party has identified only 12 strategic locations for the president’s direct participation.

The 12 proposed venues and dates are:

1. Kaduna, Kaduna State — October 24, 2026 (Saturday)
2. Port Harcourt, Rivers State — November 7, 2026 (Saturday)
3. Jos, Plateau State — November 14, 2026 (Saturday)
4. Ibadan, Oyo State — November 21, 2026 (Saturday)
5. Maiduguri, Borno State — November 25, 2026 (Wednesday)
6. Enugu, Enugu State — November 28, 2026 (Saturday)
7. Bauchi, Bauchi State — November 29, 2026 (Sunday)
8. Sokoto, Sokoto State — December 4, 2026 (Friday)
9. Asaba, Delta State — December 12, 2026 (Saturday)
10. Kano, Kano State — December 17, 2026 (Thursday)
11. Yola, Adamawa State — January 4, 2027 (Monday)
12. Lagos, Lagos State — January 9, 2027 (Saturday)

In the South-East, only Enugu made the list, leaving Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi and Imo without a scheduled presidential appearance under the current proposal.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Jehovah’s Witnesses Ease Blood Rules: Members Now Free to Accept or Donate Blood Components on Conscience

Published

on

By

The Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses has announced that members may now decide for themselves whether to accept or donate the four main components of blood, based on personal conscience.

In a statement released Friday by the organisation’s World Headquarters in Warwick, New York, and published on its website, the group said: “The decision to accept red cells, white cells, plasma or platelets from another person’s blood is a matter of personal conscience.”

It further stated that “each Witness must decide whether or not to donate blood for the clearly expressed purpose of providing components or fractions for use by another person.”

The long-standing ban on whole-blood transfusions remains firmly in place. “The long-standing refusal of whole-blood transfusions on religious grounds, a core teaching based on the command to ‘abstain from blood’ (Acts 15:20), is unchanged,” the statement emphasised.

Paul Gillies, international spokesman at the World Headquarters, said: “Blood remains sacred to Jehovah’s Witnesses, who continue to regard life and blood as precious gifts from God. We recognise that medical decisions involving blood components are a matter of conscience between each Witness and their God, Jehovah.”

The organisation described the change as a logical extension of earlier adjustments on blood fractions and the use of a person’s own blood during medical procedures. “Since the Bible does not comment on such decisions, they are a matter of individual conscience. That same reasoning has now been extended to the four main components of blood.”

Jehovah’s Witnesses stress that they value life and seek the best medical care available. They do not practise faith healing and work with doctors who can deliver effective treatment consistent with their beliefs. Local congregations will not interfere in these personal choices. “Congregations do not involve themselves in personal decisions that rest with the individual conscience. We will continue to respect and support the personal decisions of our fellow believers,” Gillies said.

The group, which claims more than nine million members in congregations across more than 200 lands, noted it is grateful for physicians who provide quality care while respecting members’ wishes regarding blood.

This latest clarification follows a March announcement that allowed individual Witnesses to decide whether their own blood could be removed, stored and returned during surgery or other medical procedures, while maintaining the prohibition on receiving blood from another person.

Continue Reading

Trending